Otivo

Learn with Otivo

Can AI help you plan for retirement?

8 minutes|

By Paul Feeney, Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Otivo

Retirement planning is mostly arithmetic. How much is in there, how fast it grows, how fast it comes out, and how long it has to last. That's a computation, and computation is the one thing software has always been better at than people. Which raises an obvious question: if the hard part is maths, why can't you just ask an AI when you can retire? The answer is that the maths was never the hard part.

AI retirement planning works well for modelling and poorly for judgement. A licensed service can project a balance, test drawdown rates and model Age Pension interaction from your actual data. A general-purpose AI tool can explain the concepts but has no verified information about your position and can't give personal advice, since that requires an Australian Financial Services Licence.

What can AI retirement planning actually calculate?

Quite a lot, provided it has real inputs. Projecting a balance forward, testing how long that balance lasts at different drawdown rates, showing what retiring two years earlier or later does to the outcome, and modelling how the Age Pension phases in as the balance falls are all well-defined calculations.

That last one matters more than most people expect. For many Australian households, retirement income isn't drawn from super alone. It's super topped up by a part Age Pension as the balance reduces, and the interaction between the two is the part almost nobody models on the back of an envelope.

What separates a useful projection from a decorative one is the quality of the inputs. A model working from a balance you half-remember produces a number with a confident-looking dollar sign on it and no more reliability than the guess it came from. A licensed service works from data it holds and can check, which is a different exercise entirely.

The four levers in a retirement plan

Almost every retirement question reduces to one of four things, and knowing which lever a question belongs to makes it much easier to work out whether AI can help.

  1. When you stop. Preservation age is 60 for all Australians, and Age Pension age is 67. The gap between those two, and where you choose to sit in it, moves the outcome more than most other decisions.
  2. How much you spend. The ASFA Retirement Standard estimates that a homeowner retiring at 67 needs a lump sum of about $630,000 as a single or $730,000 as a couple to fund a comfortable lifestyle, assuming capital is drawn down and a part Age Pension applies. Those figures rose in February 2026, the first increase in three years.
  3. What goes in before then. Contributions, including employer super guarantee at 12%, salary sacrifice and personal deductible contributions, which together count towards one combined annual concessional cap of $32,500 for 2026-27. Members eligible for the carry-forward rules may have more room than that in a given year.
  4. How it's invested. Investment option choice is one of the levers that affects long-term outcomes, and it's also the lever where general information helps least, because the answer depends on the specific options available and on circumstances a general tool can't see.

A 54-year-old asking "can I retire at 60" is really asking about all four at once. That's why the question resists a single clean answer, and why an AI response that gives one confidently is worth treating carefully.

Where general-purpose AI goes wrong on Australian retirement

On specifics that changed, and on rules that don't exist anywhere else.

Preservation age is the clearest example. For years, the age at which Australians could access super depended on birth date, on a staggered table running from 55 to 60. That phase-in completed on 1 July 2024 and now applies to nobody still approaching it. Preservation age is simply 60. A model trained on older material will reproduce the birthdate table as though it still matters.

The broader issue is that Australian retirement has features with no close equivalent in the material most of these models learned from. Preservation, condition of release, transition to retirement, the Age Pension assets and income tests, transfer balance caps. ASIC's Moneysmart made this point directly in its March 2026 guidance on AI and money decisions, warning that AI-generated financial information may not be appropriate in the Australian context.

Can AI tell you when you can afford to retire?

A licensed service can model it. Whether it can tell you is a different question, and the honest answer is that it can give you a date with assumptions attached, which is not quite the same thing.

Any retirement date rests on assumptions about returns, inflation, how long you live and what you spend. Change one and the date moves. A well-built model makes those assumptions visible and lets you test them rather than burying them. ASIC's Regulatory Guide 255 expects a digital advice provider to be transparent about the scope of what it's doing, and to decline where the scope is too narrow to serve the client properly, which is exactly the discipline this kind of modelling needs.

The useful output isn't a date. It's a picture of how sensitive that date is to the things you can control.

Where a person still beats the model

On everything that isn't a number. Whether you actually want to stop working, whether a partner's timing changes the calculation, how you'd feel watching a balance fall in a bad year, what happens if a parent needs support, whether you'd rather work three days a week than none. Those are the questions that decide most retirements, and they aren't computational.

Licensed human advisers bring judgement to exactly that territory, and to circumstances complex enough that no model has been built for them. Many Australians find the combination works better than either alone: modelling to understand the shape of the decision, and a person for the parts that turn on judgement.

Frequently asked questions

Can ChatGPT tell me how much super I need to retire?

It can explain how the ASFA Retirement Standard works and quote a benchmark, which is useful context. What it can't do is tell you how much you need, because that depends on your spending, your home ownership, your partner's position, when you stop and how long the money has to last. It also has no way to confirm it's quoting the current quarter's figures, and ASFA revises them quarterly.

Is AI retirement planning accurate?

The modelling can be, if the inputs are verified and the assumptions are stated. The common failure isn't bad arithmetic, it's confident arithmetic performed on numbers nobody checked, or on rules from an earlier financial year. Any projection is worth reading alongside its assumptions rather than as a prediction.

Does AI retirement planning count as financial advice in Australia?

Only where a licensee provides it. Personal advice, meaning a recommendation that takes your objectives, financial situation or needs into account, requires an Australian Financial Services Licence. A general-purpose AI tool holds none, so what it produces is information, however specific it looks.

Where does Otivo fit?

Otivo provides personal advice under AFSL and Australian Credit Licence No. 485665, modelling retirement from the member's own balances, income, expenses and goals rather than from typed-in estimates. Where customers follow Otivo's advice in full, they could be better off on average by $180,356 with optimised contributions, in today's dollars by retirement. If you'd like to see the four levers modelled on your own position, the retirement planning module works from your actual numbers, the contributions module tests what going in before then would do, and the super investment options covers the fourth. For genuinely complex circumstances, a licensed financial adviser remains the right escalation.

Sources

  • ASFA Retirement Standard, March 2026 quarter. superannuation.asn.au
  • ASIC Moneysmart, AI and money decisions, 23 March 2026. moneysmart.gov.au
  • ASIC, Regulatory Guide 255: Providing digital financial product advice to retail clients, August 2016.
  • Australian Taxation Office, preservation age and concessional contributions caps.
  • Services Australia, Age Pension age and indexation.

Disclaimer

The information in this communication is current as at September 2026 and has been prepared by Otivo Pty Ltd ABN 47 602 457 732, AFSL and Australian Credit Licence No. 485665. This content is general information only and has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial or taxation advice and should not be relied on as such. Before acting on any information, you should consider its appropriateness having regard to your personal circumstances. This material must not be reproduced in whole or in part, or posted on any social media platform, without the prior written consent of Otivo Pty Ltd.

Share

Related reading

Webinar: Retirement Planning AdviceAge pension: who qualifies, how much you can get, and what else comes with itWhat is super?